<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Inscitia &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inscitia.com/taxonomy/tags/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inscitia.com</link>
	<description>Frantically Fleeing Ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:55:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Interaction and the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.inscitia.com/archives/social-interaction-and-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inscitia.com/archives/social-interaction-and-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Griffiths</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speculation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inscitia.com/archives/social-interaction-and-the-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s interesting to observe that for all the friends we accumulate over a lifetime, the way we go about getting them is terribly inefficient. I&#8217;m guessing that most people meet friends at events they both attend – at school, it&#8217;s a class or a party. At work, it&#8217;s, well, they office or the pub. Consider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/20941071/" title="Friendship by *Lestrim"><img align="left" src="http://www.inscitia.com/wp-content/uploads/images/020607_0208_SocialInter1.jpg" alt="" border="0"/></a>It&#8217;s interesting to observe that for all the friends we accumulate over a lifetime, the way we go about getting them is terribly inefficient.
</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that most people meet friends at events they both attend – at school, it&#8217;s a class or a party. At work, it&#8217;s, well, they office or the pub.
</p>
<p>Consider how improbable it is that two people attending the same event will (1) meet and (2) have enough in common to become friends. Or that two people who <em>could</em> be friends (1) decide to go to the same event, (2) meet, and (3) eventually become friends.
</p>
<p>Sure, we filter out some people. For instance, people tend to approach people who &#8216;look&#8217; like them – wear the same types of clothes and so on. Then, they stay with people who speak like them – slang, jargon, etc. But that in itself is pretty misleading – how many interesting people are you filtering out? I can&#8217;t see how wearing different clothes makes you any less worth knowing.
</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to guess that it&#8217;s pretty unlikely. I&#8217;m going to assume that the &#8216;natural&#8217; way of making friends, dating, and generally finding interesting people is pretty inefficient.
</p>
<p>So what does that mean? First of all, that people, by and large, aren&#8217;t very picky when it comes to whom they&#8217;re friends with. We can guess that when making friends, the degree of &#8216;compatibility&#8217; (<em>it&#8217;s a terrible word, but I don&#8217;t have a better one</em>) determines the &#8216;quality&#8217; of the friendship.
</p>
<p>In pure speculation, I&#8217;m guessing that if you&#8217;re highly compatible with someone, you can establish a high degree of intimacy with someone after just a short time. (<em>That guy sooo understands me, in valley girl-esque speak</em>).  I&#8217;m further going to guess that you can establish a similar level of intimacy with someone less compatible, but it&#8217;s going to take more time – for those who still remember Calculus, it&#8217;s a basic integral.
</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve drawn a small diagram to illustrate the concept. If intimacy is the integral of compatibility between two people and time spent together, then it&#8217;s easy to see how you get a similar level of intimacy in a much short time. Of course, it also depends on what &#8216;type&#8217; of relationship you have – someone you&#8217;re dating heavily is much more likely to get their faster than they guy you have a couple beers with after work.
</p>
<p><img src="http://www.inscitia.com/wp-content/uploads/images/020607_0208_SocialInter2.gif" alt=""/>
	</p>
<p>So we can guess that there&#8217;s a lot of room to improve how people become friends.
</p>
<p>I think that the internet is going to play a pretty big part of that. Currently, there&#8217;s no competition. We have the pathetic little dating sites – True, Match.com, Tickle.com, etc. But they&#8217;re focused on dating, and their &#8216;tests&#8217; are quaint but not much more (besides, how many people are <em>honestly</em> going to fill out a few hundred questions just for the sake of meeting a few people?). Social networks are interesting, and enable finding people with similar interests through tag-based interest-fields. Nothing&#8217;s going to happen soon.
</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still keeping an eye on social networks and dating sites to see how fast what&#8217;s developing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inscitia.com/archives/social-interaction-and-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->